Automationbench

Summary: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in 30 Seconds DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash shipped on September 10, 2026. License is MIT, weights are on Hugging Face. 552B backbone parameters, but only 8B active while reading input and 16B while generating output. That asymmetry is the whole point of the model. New architecture: Causal Encoder-Decoder (CED). 40 layers, 20 causal encoder plus 20 decoder. The decoder’s global KV cache is projected from the encoder’s final hidden states instead of from each decoder layer’s own. Result: a global KV cache of 890 bytes per token. One quarter of V4-Flash, and 1/437 of DeepSeek-V1. Natively multimodal: images go through DeepSeek-ViT, a vision encoder trained from scratch, from the very start of language-model pre-training. Pre-training corpus is 45T tokens. Beats Claude Opus 5 on several agentic benchmarks: 90.6 vs 89.1 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, 74.2 vs 74.0 on DeepSWE v1.1, 54.8 vs 50.3 on AutomationBench. Reasoning effort is a continuous 1-100 dial, not an on/off thinking toggle. API pricing is $0.15 in / $0.60 out per million tokens off-peak, double that at peak. Roughly one twentieth of Claude Opus 5’s output price. DeepSeek is retiring V4 Pro: from September 14, 2026, deepseek-v4-pro requests get routed to V4.1 Flash and billed at Flash rates. Everyone in the open-weight race this year is chasing the same two numbers: active parameters and KV cache. The first decides what each token costs, the second decides how much memory a long context eats. GLM-5.3-Flash answered with hybrid attention, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next with 6B active parameters. ...

Two models, one price tag: $10 per million input tokens, $50 per million output tokens. GPT-6 Astra shipped on September 3, Claude Fable 5.1 on September 1. Identical sticker prices, so the comparison looks simple. It is not. The sticker is the same, the bill is not. Run the same work through both and what you pay can double or halve depending on the shape of your workload. This post starts with where that gap comes from, then walks the benchmark table, and finishes with three concrete billing scenarios. ...

On September 1, 2026, Anthropic released Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1. It has been roughly three months since Claude Fable 5 launched, and this time there is no government directive and no surprise shutdown in the story. The headline is different: the sticker price did not move, but the cost of actually running the model dropped sharply. On top of that, Fable 5.1 beats last month’s Claude Opus 5 on every benchmark Anthropic published. Let’s look at the details. ...

Summary: Gemini 3.7 Flash in 30 Seconds Gemini 3.7 Flash landed on August 13, 2026, only three weeks after 3.6 Flash. Introductory pricing is $0.75 in / $3.75 out per 1M tokens: half of 3.6 Flash’s standard rate. The promo ends December 31, 2026. Coding jumped hard: FrontierCode 1.1 went from 34.4% to 43.6%, DeepSWE v1.1 from 48.6% to 65.3%. Context window is 1,048,576 tokens with a 65,536 token output cap. It takes text, images, video, audio and PDF. It is not the smartest model on the board: 56 on the Artificial Analysis index, one point behind GPT-5.6 Terra and Muse Spark 1.2, at roughly a third of their price. Google’s Flash line has never been about winning the intelligence crown. It is the model you run at volume: cheap enough to call thousands of times a day, fast enough to sit inside a product. Gemini 3.7 Flash stretches that definition. ...

Anthropic today announced Claude Opus 5, the new flagship of the Claude family. The model brings a major jump over Opus 4.8 in agentic coding, knowledge work, computer use, and scientific research. Best of all, these gains ship at the same price. Let’s look at what the new model offers and where it stands against its rivals 🚀 What Is Claude Opus 5? Opus 5 is Anthropic’s most capable general-access model to date. Replacing Opus 4.8 , it shines especially in complex, long-horizon agentic tasks. ...